Kissinger Skates Again With Latest Theranos Movie

For more on the machinations of Henry Kissinger, John Brennan, and other CIA cronies, readers can find the larger framework in Start Here: Roadmap To Deep State Takedown, The George Webb Investigates Case File, and New Book – Chasing The Signal. The persistence behind those investigations continues through Chasing the Signal — The Final Chapter and Some Truths Are Too Big to Tell.

My argument is that a conviction should begin the next set of questions about the surrounding CIA and DARPA pump-and-dump artists, rather than bring the reporting to an end with the patsy mom in the black turtleneck.

The names behind the promise

Henry Kissinger. George Shultz. James Mattis.

Those names belonged to the Theranos boardroom. Their presence is documented in company materials introduced as trial exhibits. These were people associated with American diplomacy, military leadership, and national authority. Their names were part of the company’s presentation to the world. (files.cand.uscourts.gov)

Kissinger’s place in networks of influence has been a recurring subject of my work, including Summary of “Deep State Mate” and What If There Was a Deep State?. Other branches of that inquiry appear in Erasmus Blood On The Floor Connects All The Deep State Mates, George Webb’s Royal Dutch Virus, and Fauci And Me – A Technical Preface.

Those articles provide my wider investigative framework for the CIA pump and dump artistry. Establishing responsibility at Theranos still requires Theranos records: introductions, correspondence, compensation, board deliberations, and responses to warnings. But Holmes not making ine dime on Theranos is your canary in the coal mine.

Hollywood knows how to photograph a downfall

Amanda Seyfried’s portrayal of Holmes in The Dropout helped make the founder’s behavior familiar to millions. But the Theranos machine blowing up was a complete fabrication. Isn’t that a massive lie? Isn’t that lie more massive than any brag about cartidge micrichemistry Rlizabeth Holmes ever made?

The new documentary gives audiences another opportunity to study her, but Nathan Fielder spends more of the movie asking Holmes if she fibbed in childhood rather than asking the Producers of “The Dropout” why then concocted such a massive lie.

My objection is about the allocation of attention. How much time goes to the person at the center of the spectacle, and how much goes to the CIA pump and dump artists that helped place her there?

I have a hostory of not being kind to the CIA pump and dump artists that always seem to get a pass in Hollywood.

That “pass” question runs through Introduction To George Webb’s OPERATION HOLLYWOOD, Echoes Of Laurel Canyon – Part One – CIA In Hollywood, and Comprehensive Summary Of CIA In Hollywood – Echoes Of Laurel Canyon. My historical interpretations continue in Echoes Of Laurel Canyon – Part Twelve and Echoes Of Laurel Canyon – Part Thirteen.

A film can tell a compelling personal story and still leave an institutional story insufficiently examined, especially when the CIA pump and dump artists are involved. That is the gap I want readers to consider.

Who remains outside the frame?

The public remembers faces. An investigation has to reconstruct relationships.

Who arranged the meeting? Who supplied the introduction? Who lent credibility? Who asked for independent technical validation? Who accepted an assurance without obtaining the underlying results? The answer is Kissinger, Schultz and Mattis, and I have interviews that suggest General Mattis was coerced to lend his name to the project.

My broader writing about public narratives and concealed influence includes Echoes Of Laurel Canyon – Part Fourteen, Echoes Of Laurel Canyon – Part Sixteen, and Echoes Of Laurel Canyon – Chapter One To Five. The same interest in looking beyond the familiar story informs The Real Chinatown: Gold, Uranium, and the Chicago Mob’s Land Grab and Helter Sheltered – Part Four.

These are separate investigations and interpretations. Their relevance here is the reporting habit: keep looking beyond the most recognizable person in the story.

Follow the money carefully enough to identify the recipient

In my broadcast, I alleged that Kissinger and associates were the financial beneficiaries of Theranos. That allegation needs a transaction trail before it can be presented as an established finding.

Money raised by a company, money lost by investors, compensation paid to directors, proceeds from stock sales, and money fraudulently diverted are different categories. The reporting must identify which occurred, who received what, and which records establish it.

My interest in reconstructing financial and logistical relationships appears in Epstein Research Receipts Over Last Decade and Epstein Files – Part One – Can We Talk About The DynCorp Tail Numbers Yet?. Related branches of my archive include Epstein – Russia, Russia, Russia, Epstein Mossad Reality Time – Deal With It America, and Epstein – Not A $200 Handmaid’s Tale.

The Theranos assignment is concrete: obtain the financial records and make the categories visible.

A famous name can open a door

The question goes beyond whether a director personally sold stock. A prominent person can help a company attract meetings, attention, and confidence.

What representations accompanied those introductions? What did the introducer understand about the technology? What happened when that understanding was challenged?

My archive explores allegations about influential intermediaries in Esptein’s Connections With Ehud Barack Reach Back To Iran Contra and 9/11, Ehud Barak, Les Wexner, And Jeff Epstein Were Godfathers Of Palantir, and Did Epstein Present Palantir’s “Find, Fix, and Finish” At His Directed Evolution Conference. Further background appears in We Played Epstein Chopin While The World Played Chopsticks and Epstein And Maxwell – A Mossad Journey.

Those titles preserve my arguments about other networks. At Theranos, the necessary next step is to document the specific introductions and assurances.

The record must survive the explanation

A person can explain a meeting years afterward. A dated email can show what participants were saying at the time.

That is why I want calendars, correspondence, presentations, financial statements, and the original technical claims placed beside later testimony. A chronology gives readers something they can inspect.

That emphasis on records and communications runs through George Webb’s Awan Minutes To Midnight – Part One and George Webb’s Blackberrys Did Matter – Part 1. My writing about investigative method also includes Investigative Analysis — Metadata Doesn’t Mourn, FED SLOP & THE METADATA WAR, and Nine Years Of Reporting At Ft. Huachuca Vs. Nine Days.

Metadata can help establish timing and contact. Determining intent requires the surrounding evidence.

Build the chronology before announcing the connection

Theranos offers a straightforward chronological assignment. Put each major promise beside the company’s technical capabilities at that moment. Then put the fundraising, board discussions, warnings, and public endorsements on the same calendar.

When did someone learn that the technology could not perform as advertised? What did that person do afterward?

The longer history of my interest in information and institutional accountability appears in Chasing The Signal – Chapter Two, Chasing The Signal – Chapter Three – 9/11 Commission Coverup, and Chasing The Signal – Chapter Four. The personal and reporting chronology continues in Chasing The Signal – Chapter Six and Chasing The Signal – Chapter Seven.

An investigative connection becomes useful when the dates and records support it.

The institution has a history, too

A founder arrives in an existing world of investors, advisers, government contacts, and professional gatekeepers. Examining that environment helps explain how an extraordinary promise acquires authority.

That is part of the wider institutional inquiry behind Chasing The Signal – Chapter Eight, Chasing The Signal – Chapter Nine, and Chasing The Signal – Chapter Ten. Separate historical and operational hypotheses appear in NCTC Roots, The House Of Hoax Bin Laden Station and Mena To Waco To Huachuca – Drugs For Weapons.

For Theranos, the reporting question is narrower and answerable: which gatekeepers examined the evidence, and which relied on the reputations of other gatekeepers?

Demand the records behind the headline

Document release matters because it allows people outside an institution to compare its public account with its internal conduct.

My archive contains forceful allegations about other document controversies, including Trump Raid Smoking Guns – Pottinger’s Planted Plots And Alina Habba’s Top Secret Docs “Stolen” From Her Car A Few Months Before The Raid and Trump Calls For Document Release – Because He Knows Alina Habba’s Car “Robbery” Is Where Top Secret Docs Came From.

Other branches include Iran Contra Friends Go To Washington, The Braverman Prophecy – Part Two – The Southern Route For Gas To Europe, and George Webb Uranium Starter Pack – The Five Best Articles (Of 140 videos and articles).

These provide background to my reporting interests. The common demand is access to records capable of confirming or contradicting the allegation.

Ask precisely what a later disclosure confirms

A new document can support a date, identify a participant, or contradict an earlier statement. Its significance should be stated precisely.

I return to questions of sources and retrospective interpretation in Who Is Deep Uranium? and Still Validated After All These Years. Other long-running investigations appear in The Last Jarrah — Part Two, Return To LISK – Long Island Serial Killer – Part One, and Mangione Mob Ties And Pelosi Ties Can’t Be Denied.

The same discipline belongs in the Theranos discussion. Evidence that a prominent person sat on the board establishes board membership. Evidence that someone received a payment establishes a payment. Knowing participation in fraud requires additional proof.

Listen to the people who challenged the institution

One of the most revealing Theranos stories concerns Tyler Shultz.

He raised concerns about testing failures, faced hostility, and became a source for journalist John Carreyrou. His grandfather, Theranos board member George Shultz, initially did not support his claims. That history shows how difficult it could be to challenge the company even from within a powerful family. (scu.edu)

The persistence of people asking uncomfortable questions is central to Four Grandmothers Tougher on Fauci than Congress, The Email Trail Points to Fauci Destruction of Evidence, and We Still Have Great Leads in the Fauci Investigation. The earlier research narrative continues in Real Corona Live Exercise – Part One – Return To Patient Zero and Meet The Paul Revere Of The CoronaVirus Live Exercise.

Those pandemic interpretations require their own evidence. The Theranos lesson is that an institution’s confidence should never substitute for examining a warning.

Keep the original reporting beside the reconstruction

A documentary assembles a story. A reporter must also preserve the material from which that story was assembled.

What was recorded at the time? What was remembered later? What was reconstructed for an audience? Those distinctions let viewers assess the work.

My efforts to carry an investigation into documentary and musical forms appear in OPERATION LOCKDOWN: THE RESOLUTION, WE NOW HAVE AN ENDING – Operation Aerosolize Ebola, and Operation Lockdown Resolution – The AIR EBOLA Validation. Further treatments include Operation Lockdown Resolution — Day Two and Why I Wrote The Operation Lockdown Song.

For Theranos, I want the audience to have access to the board materials, the technical record, and the warnings alongside the film’s intimate portrait.

Human consequences deserve more than a supporting role

The stakes of unreliable medical testing reach beyond investors and boardrooms. People make decisions about their health based on results they believe they can trust.

My wider archive moves between personal testimony, community rebuilding, and institutional criticism. That range includes The Seven COVID Suicides, Less Tragedy, More Hope — Day 3, and the hypotheses advanced in The Great Cancering – Part Seven – Are John Brennan And CIA Cancer mRNA Vaccines Next?. Other institutional arguments appear in Brennan CIA Operative Joe Kent Now Plays The Victim and The Ziklag Infiltration: Faith-Based Power Shift in American Conservatism.

These are broader archive readings, rather than evidence about Theranos. They show why I keep asking how institutions distribute authority—and who bears the consequences when that authority fails.

A prosecution answers particular charges

Holmes was convicted on four investor-related fraud counts and originally sentenced to 135 months. Balwani was separately convicted and sentenced. These were the company’s leading executives; calling them “little criminals” in my headline expresses a comparison with the establishment figures I want scrutinized, rather than a description of junior employees. (justice.gov, justice.gov)

My broader questions about public narratives and legal accountability appear in Real J6 Series Introduction – Just Published and Trump Bans CNN—But Banning Isn’t Investigating. Other disputed interpretations appear in Is The DNC Trying To J6 Charlie Kirk?, Lone Gunman Story Alive And Well In America, and Charlie Kirk Murder – Sync Shot Again?.

A prosecution’s scope and a journalist’s scope differ. Reporters can continue examining institutional failures while accurately describing what the courts established.

“Patsy” is a hypothesis that needs evidence

I repeatedly ask whether a visible defendant is carrying responsibility that belongs more widely. But calling someone a patsy does not establish innocence, and conviction of one person does not establish the guilt of an uncharged associate.

That concern appears explicitly in Defending The Patsy Is The Surest Way To Death and Double Cross Lacrosse – New Pasty Suspect Emerges. Related questions and creative treatments appear in Why I Wrote “Knockin’ on Assassins’ Doors”, Assassins v George Webb, and The Secret Life Of Mitch Snow – DOGE Suicide Bomber.

For Theranos, my challenge is to investigate whether the public accounting adequately examined the wider network. Establishing deliberate scapegoating would require evidence of its own.

Examine the source as closely as the target

Every investigation depends on assessing people who claim to possess inside knowledge. What did they witness? What can they document? Which parts of their account are inference?

The archive contains arguments about competing accounts in Which Was It – Erika One Or Erika Two? and Erika And Andrew’s Beach Blanket Bingo – Coming Right Atcha. Other writings concerning whistleblowers and alleged targeting include The Rothschild Effect – We Replace You With Someone Who Isn’t A Whistleblower, The Last Moments Of The AI Whistleblower – Suchir Balaji, and Did Candace Owens Get Targeted By “Charles Redshield”, AKA Mossad General Danny Rothschild?.

These titles identify my published allegations and interpretations. Their inclusion does not establish them as findings. In the Theranos inquiry, each witness’s account should likewise be tested against contemporary records.

Preserve the material that allows disagreement

An archive lets readers compare an original statement with a later explanation. It also allows critics to identify mistakes.

That is why my reporting-preservation arguments belong in this discussion. They appear in YouTube Just Erased Thousands of My On-Site Reporting Videos, Restore The Archive – Fauci Criminal Evidence Is Needed, and Spoliation Notice For Google And YouTube Class Action. The public-access argument continues in Freedom of Speech Is Like Freedom of Movement and Two Narratives, Only One Right to Report.

For Theranos, preservation means retaining the record beyond the scenes selected for a film: the warnings, correspondence, financial documents, technical evaluations, and responses.

The newsroom has to keep working after the premiere

A film release creates an opportunity to ask fresh questions. Public attention can bring forward another witness or lead a reader to an overlooked document.

My arguments for maintaining that reporting capacity appear in A Newsroom Worth Defending – YouTube Lawsuit Review and Why I Wrote “No Left Turn at Albuquerque”. Other community and information-accountability discussions include ’Tis the Season for Election Hacking, The Rhodes Demoralization Plan, and Rocking Chairs Vs. Palantir – We Win.

The next useful Theranos contribution may be a dated email, a compensation record, or a participant willing to explain a meeting on the record.

Put the boardroom under the same light

My Hollywood critique ends where the reporting assignment begins.

Who benefited financially? Who supplied credibility? Who received warnings? Who challenged the company? Who remained silent? Which decisions reflected deception, which reflected failed oversight, and which reflected reliance on information that turned out to be false?

The collaborative newsroom behind those questions appears in Swing State Studios: A Newsroom You Can Walk Into and Two Schools of Thought. The personal persistence and wider comparative reporting continue in HOW THE HELL IS GEORGE WEBB STILL ALIVE?, Courage More Than Penmanship In A Battleground State, and Epstein Metadata Matches Butler And Charlie Kirk.

Those one hundred links offer a trail through my reporting, hypotheses, and arguments. The Theranos allegations still have to stand on the Theranos evidence.

Holmes’s conviction establishes her responsibility for the offenses proved against her. It does not answer every question about the people and institutions around her.

I want that wider accounting.

Follow the introductions. Follow the warnings. Follow the payments.

And keep the camera on the boardroom long enough to ask the next question.